Happy New Year!
I returned from the holidays to a number of fun news stories summarizing 2007 IT events (check out #13), the past year in CRM innovations (see #2), and making predictions for 2008. Most notable was the story CIO Insider ran a few days ago: How to Do CRM Online: Three Big Ideas for 2008
I think this article brings up a few key points that align well with a number of our goals at Concursive: know our customers, listen to our customers, and protect our customers. As 2008 develops we will continue to put focus on each.
Friday, January 4, 2008
Friday, December 21, 2007
A Look Back at 2007: Open Source and Social Networking
The end of 2007 is close, an ideal chance to reflect back on the year. It’s been a great year for us, from gaining investment from Intel, launching our new Concourse Suite 5.0, and of course our name change which reflects the growing presence of the company. I’d like to take this opportunity to thank our employees, customers, partners and investors, which have supported us throughout 2007.
I noticed that Mashable, the largest social networking news blog, ran a piece on “Best of 2007: Trends That Shaped the Web”. Three of the trends that Mashable selected: ecommerce, social networking and open source, are all areas that Concursive is directly involved in. In our drive to enable organizations to connect through the simplicity of a single platform solution, we provide the tools that better enable ecommerce, embrace all social networking standards – and all through open source standards.
The momentum of these areas: trading and connecting online, and looking for new and innovative ways to do so, is set to increase throughout 2008. As the lines blur between different communities and how individuals connect, there is a huge opportunity for businesses and media to be more innovative, to embrace new ways of working and to play their role in bringing groups together. 2008 promises to be an interesting year and Concursive is committed to playing its part.
We’ll be off for the next few days- Happy Holidays from all of us at Concursive!
Michael Harvey
I noticed that Mashable, the largest social networking news blog, ran a piece on “Best of 2007: Trends That Shaped the Web”. Three of the trends that Mashable selected: ecommerce, social networking and open source, are all areas that Concursive is directly involved in. In our drive to enable organizations to connect through the simplicity of a single platform solution, we provide the tools that better enable ecommerce, embrace all social networking standards – and all through open source standards.
The momentum of these areas: trading and connecting online, and looking for new and innovative ways to do so, is set to increase throughout 2008. As the lines blur between different communities and how individuals connect, there is a huge opportunity for businesses and media to be more innovative, to embrace new ways of working and to play their role in bringing groups together. 2008 promises to be an interesting year and Concursive is committed to playing its part.
We’ll be off for the next few days- Happy Holidays from all of us at Concursive!
Michael Harvey
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Interoperability in Open Source
Last week was an exceptionally busy week for Concursive: launching our new website, announcing our name change, and releasing our new Concourse Suite 5.0. And during this hectic week, there was even more news that I wanted to take a moment to address.
Our friends at the Open Solutions Alliance released the results of the surveys they have been collecting, evaluating customers’ views on Open Source software. Overall, the data seems to be pretty positive, highlighting the cost effectiveness and simple customization of Open Source solutions. Conversely, the OSA found that the point of contention for customers is the potential interoperability issues with Open Source applications.
Although interoperability with Open Source applications could be a genuine concern for customers, I think OSA President Dominic Sartorio’s quote sums up our stance on this:
That’s exactly how we see this at Concursive. Interoperability has always been a large focus for us, because we have moved from creating traditional CRM software to highly scalable integrated applications for extended enterprises. I look forward to seeing how the rest of the open source market develops and reacts to this news.
Like Dominic said, this is a perfect opportunity for us and other Open Source vendors to distinguish ourselves by answering the customers’ needs of improved interoperability. Impress them now and gain their support for the future.
Read the full summary report here (PDF warning).
Our friends at the Open Solutions Alliance released the results of the surveys they have been collecting, evaluating customers’ views on Open Source software. Overall, the data seems to be pretty positive, highlighting the cost effectiveness and simple customization of Open Source solutions. Conversely, the OSA found that the point of contention for customers is the potential interoperability issues with Open Source applications.
Although interoperability with Open Source applications could be a genuine concern for customers, I think OSA President Dominic Sartorio’s quote sums up our stance on this:
“These findings represent a clear opportunity for the OSA to out-Microsoft Microsoft by offering a fully interoperable suite of business tools,” … “If we can help our members’ solutions work well together it makes it easier for our channel partners to sell open-source software and it will translate into more revenue for vendors and even more options for customers.”
That’s exactly how we see this at Concursive. Interoperability has always been a large focus for us, because we have moved from creating traditional CRM software to highly scalable integrated applications for extended enterprises. I look forward to seeing how the rest of the open source market develops and reacts to this news.
Like Dominic said, this is a perfect opportunity for us and other Open Source vendors to distinguish ourselves by answering the customers’ needs of improved interoperability. Impress them now and gain their support for the future.
Read the full summary report here (PDF warning).
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Welcome to the Concursive Blog
As you can tell by the new blog address and name, there have been a few sweeping changes around here. Well we’ve been busy! With great pleasure, today CentricCRM announces its new name, Concursive Corporation and a new front office solution, ConcourseSuite 5.0
For some time now, our company vision has been evolving to reflect a shift beyond the boundaries of “traditional” Customer Relationship Management. CRM has traditionally focused on aggregating large amounts of customer data into sales automation, marketing automation, or customer service silos. ConcourseSuite adds significant additional capabilities that help address the needs of today's businesses who must operate in an always on, always wired world. The product is a complete front office solution that includes standard CRM capabilities, as well as web content management, enterprise content management, and team collaboration.. We wanted the new name of the company to reflect this expanded vision.
Concursive is a name we created and is derived from the word “concursion,” which means “running together of people, things, and ideas”. The Latin root “con carre” gives rise to other words such as “concourse,” “concurrent” and “concur.” All concepts and ideas we believe fit with the direction of the company - specifically the word concourse - a place where people meet and come together.
The new application, Concourse Suite 5.0, (formerly Centric CRM), integrates CRM, website creation, content management and Enterprise 2.0 technologies. This tool provides an open forum for collaboration, debate, and productivity; a place where connections are made.
This blog aims to be a destination for similar connections: here we can collaborate and debate CRM, Open Source, and anything about bringing companies closer to their customers through technology.
Check back here for more updates and go visit our new website at www.concursive.com
For some time now, our company vision has been evolving to reflect a shift beyond the boundaries of “traditional” Customer Relationship Management. CRM has traditionally focused on aggregating large amounts of customer data into sales automation, marketing automation, or customer service silos. ConcourseSuite adds significant additional capabilities that help address the needs of today's businesses who must operate in an always on, always wired world. The product is a complete front office solution that includes standard CRM capabilities, as well as web content management, enterprise content management, and team collaboration.. We wanted the new name of the company to reflect this expanded vision.
Concursive is a name we created and is derived from the word “concursion,” which means “running together of people, things, and ideas”. The Latin root “con carre” gives rise to other words such as “concourse,” “concurrent” and “concur.” All concepts and ideas we believe fit with the direction of the company - specifically the word concourse - a place where people meet and come together.
The new application, Concourse Suite 5.0, (formerly Centric CRM), integrates CRM, website creation, content management and Enterprise 2.0 technologies. This tool provides an open forum for collaboration, debate, and productivity; a place where connections are made.
This blog aims to be a destination for similar connections: here we can collaborate and debate CRM, Open Source, and anything about bringing companies closer to their customers through technology.
Check back here for more updates and go visit our new website at www.concursive.com
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Getting and Growing Customers during the Holiday Shopping Frenzy
When it came to holiday shopping this year I had only two questions: “is it possible to avoid real stores and do it all online this year?” and “where the heck can I find a Nintendo Wii?”. As promos for “Black Friday” begin showing up as early as October and an abundance of stories emerge in the papers highlighting the joys of holiday shopping - excruciating lines and fights with fellow shoppers over merchandise, it is clear to many that the holiday shopping experience can be a burden.
CRM Buyer recently ran an article “Tips for Surviving the Holiday Shopping Experience” outlining what consumers are looking for to get the most out of a shopping experience. These tips aim to help both consumers and the companies out there - looking for ways to improve time spent in stores.
This article is predicated on the notion that we need help to survive out there in the consumer frenzy. And that’s just it: consumers are now expecting a negative experience. While consumers see this time as a nightmare, I see holiday shopping as a chance for retailers to get and grow their customer base.
The holidays present an opportunity for companies to impress their customers; show them they are different, friendly, helpful, and that they standout from the pack. Surprise your consumers who are expecting to be overwhelmed this holiday season by offering them exceptional customer service and they will be your customers for life.
Making a positive impression on your consumers this holiday season will help build brand loyalty, gain your company a few customer champions, and turn a little extra effort now into better relationships in 2008.
CRM Buyer recently ran an article “Tips for Surviving the Holiday Shopping Experience” outlining what consumers are looking for to get the most out of a shopping experience. These tips aim to help both consumers and the companies out there - looking for ways to improve time spent in stores.
This article is predicated on the notion that we need help to survive out there in the consumer frenzy. And that’s just it: consumers are now expecting a negative experience. While consumers see this time as a nightmare, I see holiday shopping as a chance for retailers to get and grow their customer base.
The holidays present an opportunity for companies to impress their customers; show them they are different, friendly, helpful, and that they standout from the pack. Surprise your consumers who are expecting to be overwhelmed this holiday season by offering them exceptional customer service and they will be your customers for life.
Making a positive impression on your consumers this holiday season will help build brand loyalty, gain your company a few customer champions, and turn a little extra effort now into better relationships in 2008.
Monday, November 26, 2007
Red Hat's blessing of Sun Java: No longer any excuse for open source developers not to use Java
Red Hat's recently announced support of the Sun OpenJDK project is a huge win for both the open source and Java developer communities. In the past, Sun's licensing practices kept it from being fully embraced by the open source community. To date, Sun's Java—which is obviously the gold standard—has never been included in a Linux distribution. As a result, open source developers in the past may well have adopted other languages and architectures because of this. As of today, Java comes fully into the open source mainstream. Given its technical superiority including a great security architecture and unrivaled suitability for enterprise-class applications, there is no longer any excuse for open source developers not to choose Java as their platform of choice. I suspect we will see a flood of new open source applications developed on Java. At Centric CRM, we fully embraced Java many years ago and have never regretted our choice. Today's announcement by Sun and Red Hat only increases our commitment to both the open source and Java-based paths that we are on.
Google's Android: Open Source Phones and CRM
Google’s recent announcement of Android, the open source development platform for mobile devices, is a fascinating new move in mobile software and as I see it, an important step in the ongoing evolution of next generation CRM (Customer Relationship Management).
Take a look at Mobile Opportunity’s post which breaks down the details of Android.
From a technical standpoint, I think it makes a lot of sense that Android’s fundamental platform architecture is Linux and Java, with a SQL database, because of its advantages with security, cross-platform portability, and general robustness. From a business standpoint, I’m thrilled that Google chose this platform because it is precisely the same architecture that we used to build Centric CRM. With all the advantages of the Java platform, there’s no question why we--and Google--chose it as the basis for enterprise-level applications.
To kick off Android, Google is hosting a competition for mobile developers with a $10M prize for the best application built this winter. And while it will likely be a glitzy consumer application that wins, I think the most valuable use of the platform will be to enable the creation of true enterprise class business applications that can be used on a wide variety of devices by business people on the go.
An extended enterprise needs a CRM that can adapt to its diverse needs independent of location. Now with the opportunity Android provides, and other advances in the mobile enterprise space, CRM can extend this advantage to mobile devices optimizing productivity for anyone in the company in any location.
Now I’m not officially stating that Centric will be going after the $10M prize… but let’s just say that the opportunity that Android created has really generated some buzz from our development teams. With the convenience and portability of the Java platform and the new demands of mobile business people, Android could easily be the next big step for CRM software.
Take a look at Mobile Opportunity’s post which breaks down the details of Android.
From a technical standpoint, I think it makes a lot of sense that Android’s fundamental platform architecture is Linux and Java, with a SQL database, because of its advantages with security, cross-platform portability, and general robustness. From a business standpoint, I’m thrilled that Google chose this platform because it is precisely the same architecture that we used to build Centric CRM. With all the advantages of the Java platform, there’s no question why we--and Google--chose it as the basis for enterprise-level applications.
To kick off Android, Google is hosting a competition for mobile developers with a $10M prize for the best application built this winter. And while it will likely be a glitzy consumer application that wins, I think the most valuable use of the platform will be to enable the creation of true enterprise class business applications that can be used on a wide variety of devices by business people on the go.
An extended enterprise needs a CRM that can adapt to its diverse needs independent of location. Now with the opportunity Android provides, and other advances in the mobile enterprise space, CRM can extend this advantage to mobile devices optimizing productivity for anyone in the company in any location.
Now I’m not officially stating that Centric will be going after the $10M prize… but let’s just say that the opportunity that Android created has really generated some buzz from our development teams. With the convenience and portability of the Java platform and the new demands of mobile business people, Android could easily be the next big step for CRM software.
Monday, October 1, 2007
The Benefits of Beta Software
Here at Centric we have several rules of thumb. One of my favorites is never cast your beta net too wide, which seems to be happening in the CRM market recently.
The beta testing system is about bringing a select number of users into the vendor's fold in order to get a close communication between user and the developers. This not only helps the vendor with the trickier aspects of fine-tuning, it also ensures that end users are crystal clear on what they are using at the stage it is at. The final version might be right round the corner, but what if the company responsible for the beta keeps moving the corner? Without complete insider knowledge, customers simply can’t predict what will and won’t break when the final code ships.
Of course from the platform vendor’s point of view there are obvious advantages to rolling out a beta to as many people as possible. Microsoft in particular has long enlisted the help of interested enthusiasts and experts to help it iron out the inevitable bugs in its software. Parading betas in public can also prove to be a useful marketing ploy in terms of raising the profile of both the company and its products.
It’s not just vendors who benefit from betas. As users we all like access to the latest and greatest tools (so late and great they are still in beta). If you can deal with the pain that goes with them (now and in the future) it sometimes makes sense to experiment with beta products – you might even use them for some prototyping work. But to start working on mission-critical projects using a beta version as your preferred platform makes no sense.
Beta software, by its very definition, is unfinished software. It’s a product in the pipeline and inevitably contains bugs and glitches to be identifed and resolved. What’s more, test driving a beta version of a Microsoft Office word processor is one thing; installing a beta version of a complete CRM platform is quite another.
At Centric, we believe the whole point of coming up with a developer beta is to identify potential pitfalls, problems and challenges and resolve them before we release our products to the broader marketplace. As such, betas are very much an internal matter. What we might lose in short term publicity we will more than make up for in terms of long-term respect from our customers.
The beta testing system is about bringing a select number of users into the vendor's fold in order to get a close communication between user and the developers. This not only helps the vendor with the trickier aspects of fine-tuning, it also ensures that end users are crystal clear on what they are using at the stage it is at. The final version might be right round the corner, but what if the company responsible for the beta keeps moving the corner? Without complete insider knowledge, customers simply can’t predict what will and won’t break when the final code ships.
Of course from the platform vendor’s point of view there are obvious advantages to rolling out a beta to as many people as possible. Microsoft in particular has long enlisted the help of interested enthusiasts and experts to help it iron out the inevitable bugs in its software. Parading betas in public can also prove to be a useful marketing ploy in terms of raising the profile of both the company and its products.
It’s not just vendors who benefit from betas. As users we all like access to the latest and greatest tools (so late and great they are still in beta). If you can deal with the pain that goes with them (now and in the future) it sometimes makes sense to experiment with beta products – you might even use them for some prototyping work. But to start working on mission-critical projects using a beta version as your preferred platform makes no sense.
Beta software, by its very definition, is unfinished software. It’s a product in the pipeline and inevitably contains bugs and glitches to be identifed and resolved. What’s more, test driving a beta version of a Microsoft Office word processor is one thing; installing a beta version of a complete CRM platform is quite another.
At Centric, we believe the whole point of coming up with a developer beta is to identify potential pitfalls, problems and challenges and resolve them before we release our products to the broader marketplace. As such, betas are very much an internal matter. What we might lose in short term publicity we will more than make up for in terms of long-term respect from our customers.
Friday, September 28, 2007
The Value of Transparency
Open source software can justifiably claim to have spawned one of the most vibrant and intelligent communities in existence. The main tenet of the open source community—and this should go without saying—is openness, running from the decisions made by the higher echelons of management at open source software companies down to the very bedrock of the code itself. This tenet has turned the traditional marketing cycle on its head.
As more companies embrace an open culture, there are fewer rumors about potential deals, releases and products, and this positively affects the quality of products. This is not to say that rumor mongering no longer exists: gossip and speculation accompany all healthy communities—it comes with the territory. There is, however, more knowledge of what is happening internally within each company in the open source space, than in other sectors. Dana Blankenhorn recently pointed out in a blog posting:
“What passes for rumor is speculation over the importance of things which have, in fact, happened. Even among proprietary vendors.”
In essence, because users are already familiar with the products under speculation, they are only left with guessing future impact. In short, open source users have an inherent understanding of their role in shaping the software and direction of a vendor.
This knowledge has several implications:
1.) Companies embody what users want. As the community voices its thoughts and concerns in real-time, the enhanced feedback leads to products that users want.
2.) Faster spread of information. In today’s collaborative Web 2.0 environment, information travels at breakneck speed throughout the software world. As products evolve, users talk about them more and more and become increasingly involved in their actual development. The more ownership users have of products, the greater they want to utilize them.
3.) More trust. Trust is a premium in the business world. If a potential user is able to read the comments of a community on open forums, and view the product’s progress, they will be able to see at first hand how reputable the product is, and the degree to which it is serviced. By experiencing an open source company delivering on its promises at first hand, a potential user is more likely to trust, and therefore want to utilize, the company’s software.
Matt Asay, in his “10 things the world can learn from open source” makes a great point on the subject of transparency and trust:
Transparency breeds trust, and trust breeds revenue. Open source teaches us to reveal the supposed crown jewels—source code—but it also teaches open-source companies to provide open roadmaps, user forums, etc. The more transparent a company, the less time that is wasted on helping customers to justify a purchase decision. Give them maximum information and then sell to them on their terms, when they're ready to buy. In the open-source world this translates into dramatically shorter sales cycles because by the time a customer knocks on your door, they're already sold.
To sum up, it is a never-ending cycle of openness breeding beneficial two-way relationships that bring more users into the fold. As openness grows, so do communication, trust and the user base. As more users get involved, they bring with them a more detailed and wider range of input, thereby ensuring continued innovation.
As more companies embrace an open culture, there are fewer rumors about potential deals, releases and products, and this positively affects the quality of products. This is not to say that rumor mongering no longer exists: gossip and speculation accompany all healthy communities—it comes with the territory. There is, however, more knowledge of what is happening internally within each company in the open source space, than in other sectors. Dana Blankenhorn recently pointed out in a blog posting:
“What passes for rumor is speculation over the importance of things which have, in fact, happened. Even among proprietary vendors.”
In essence, because users are already familiar with the products under speculation, they are only left with guessing future impact. In short, open source users have an inherent understanding of their role in shaping the software and direction of a vendor.
This knowledge has several implications:
1.) Companies embody what users want. As the community voices its thoughts and concerns in real-time, the enhanced feedback leads to products that users want.
2.) Faster spread of information. In today’s collaborative Web 2.0 environment, information travels at breakneck speed throughout the software world. As products evolve, users talk about them more and more and become increasingly involved in their actual development. The more ownership users have of products, the greater they want to utilize them.
3.) More trust. Trust is a premium in the business world. If a potential user is able to read the comments of a community on open forums, and view the product’s progress, they will be able to see at first hand how reputable the product is, and the degree to which it is serviced. By experiencing an open source company delivering on its promises at first hand, a potential user is more likely to trust, and therefore want to utilize, the company’s software.
Matt Asay, in his “10 things the world can learn from open source” makes a great point on the subject of transparency and trust:
Transparency breeds trust, and trust breeds revenue. Open source teaches us to reveal the supposed crown jewels—source code—but it also teaches open-source companies to provide open roadmaps, user forums, etc. The more transparent a company, the less time that is wasted on helping customers to justify a purchase decision. Give them maximum information and then sell to them on their terms, when they're ready to buy. In the open-source world this translates into dramatically shorter sales cycles because by the time a customer knocks on your door, they're already sold.
To sum up, it is a never-ending cycle of openness breeding beneficial two-way relationships that bring more users into the fold. As openness grows, so do communication, trust and the user base. As more users get involved, they bring with them a more detailed and wider range of input, thereby ensuring continued innovation.
Labels:
collaboration,
community,
open source,
transparency
Friday, August 3, 2007
Oregon and On and On
The waves from this week's OSCON in Portland, Oregon, are still rippling through the open source community. As you would expect from an O'Reilly event, there was plenty of debate at the conference, not least about 'badgeware' licenses.
Ross Mayfield, the CEO of SocialText, announced at OSCON that the OSI had approved SocialText's attribution-style license. This so-called 'badgeware' license is called the Common Public Attribution License (CPAL) and is based on the Mozilla Public License (MPL) with some significant modifications in the areas of developer attribution and delivery of the software as a service on a network.
I think this announcement will spark two stampedes: first, a number of vendors will rush to adopt SocialText's license and thereby gain OSI approval. But there will be plenty fleeing in the other direction too. I expect to see some OSI members dissociate themselves from the OSI, which has historically expressed a strong defense of its own strict definition of open source and a strong distaste for 'badgeware' licenses.
At Centric CRM, we're following nobody. We won't join the rush to the CPAL. Our recent announcement of new products, based on licenses which satisfy the needs of our users and communities, demonstrates we are very much open to different licensing approaches—some certified by the OSI, some not—that serve the interests of our customers and our business.
Software must be built in whatever way suits the users and companies that are going to build their businesses on it. It remains the responsibility of vendors to be clear about their intentions. But, as the debate around badgeware shows, there's no such thing as a 'one size fits all' license for software. You can't please all the people all the time. The important thing is to focus on the customer.
Ross Mayfield, the CEO of SocialText, announced at OSCON that the OSI had approved SocialText's attribution-style license. This so-called 'badgeware' license is called the Common Public Attribution License (CPAL) and is based on the Mozilla Public License (MPL) with some significant modifications in the areas of developer attribution and delivery of the software as a service on a network.
I think this announcement will spark two stampedes: first, a number of vendors will rush to adopt SocialText's license and thereby gain OSI approval. But there will be plenty fleeing in the other direction too. I expect to see some OSI members dissociate themselves from the OSI, which has historically expressed a strong defense of its own strict definition of open source and a strong distaste for 'badgeware' licenses.
At Centric CRM, we're following nobody. We won't join the rush to the CPAL. Our recent announcement of new products, based on licenses which satisfy the needs of our users and communities, demonstrates we are very much open to different licensing approaches—some certified by the OSI, some not—that serve the interests of our customers and our business.
Software must be built in whatever way suits the users and companies that are going to build their businesses on it. It remains the responsibility of vendors to be clear about their intentions. But, as the debate around badgeware shows, there's no such thing as a 'one size fits all' license for software. You can't please all the people all the time. The important thing is to focus on the customer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)